Analog Game Studies

Analog Game Studies

Search
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Catalog
    • Volume I
      • Volume I, Issue I
      • Volume I, Issue II
      • Vol. I, No. III (October 2014)
      • Volume I, Issue IV
      • Volume I, Issue V
    • Volume II
      • Analog Players, Analog Space: Video Gaming Beyond the Digital
      • Volume II, Issue II
      • Volume II, Issue III
      • Volume II, Issue IV
      • Volume II, Issue V
      • Volume II, Issue VI
      • Volume II, Issue VII
    • Volume III
      • Vol. III, No. I (January 2016)
      • Volume III, Issue II
      • Volume III, Issue III
      • Volume III, Issue IV
      • Volume III, Issue V
      • 2016 Role-Playing Game Summit
    • Volume IV
      • Vol. IV, No. I (January 2017)
      • Volume IV, Issue II
      • Volume IV, Issue III
      • Volume IV, Issue IV
      • Volume IV, Issue V
    • Volume V
      • Vol. V, No. I (March 2018)
      • Volume V, Issue II
      • Volume V, Issue III
      • Vol. V, No. IV (December 2018)
    • Volume VI
      • Volume VI, Issue I
      • Volume VI, Issue II
      • Volume VI, Issue III
      • 2019 Role-Playing Game Summit
    • Volume VII
      • Special Issue: Analog Games and Translation
      • Volume VII, Issue II
    • Volume VIII
      • Volume VIII, Issue I
      • Volume VIII, Issue II
      • The Fiend Folio
    • Volume IX
      • Volume IX, Issue I
      • Volume IX, Issue II
      • Volume IX, Issue III
      • Volume IX, Issue IV
    • Volume X
      • Volume X, Issue I
      • Volume X, Issue II
    • Volume XI
      • Volume XI, Issue I
      • Volume XI, Issue II
      • Special Issue: Perspectives on RPG Studies from Latin-American Scholars
      • Volume IX, Issue III
    • Volume XII
      • Volume XII, Issue I
    • Special Issues
      • 2016 Role-Playing Game Summit
      • 2019 Role-Playing Game Summit
      • Special Issue: Analog Games and Translation
      • Analog Players, Analog Space: Video Gaming Beyond the Digital
      • The Fiend Folio
      • Special Issue: Perspectives on RPG Studies from Latin-American Scholars
  • In Print
  • The Team
    • Editorial Board
    • Authors (Volume 12)
    • Authors (Volume 11)
    • Authors (Volume 10)
    • Authors (Volume 9)
    • Authors (Volume 8)
    • Authors (Volume 7)
    • Authors (Volume 6)
    • Authors (Volume 5)
    • Authors (Volume 4)
    • Authors (Volume 3)
    • Authors (Volume 2)
    • Authors (Volume 1)
  • Generation Analog
    • Generation Analog 2025 “PUNK” CFP
  • Calls for Participation
  • About
  • Contact
    • Submit
    • Special Issues
Book Review

Book Review: The Rule Book: The Building Blocks of Games

December 15, 2024 Bea Livesey-Stephens

Jaakko Stenros and Markus Montola. 2024. The Rule Book: The Building Blocks of Games. The MIT Press. 252 pages, Paperback. ISBN 9780262547444.

In The Rule Book: The Building Blocks of Games, Jaakko Stenros and Markus Montola masterfully “untangle the mangle of play”1 using their seminal constructionist ludology approach. This approach explores the boundaries surrounding play, in the context of the world around players. Each chapter after the introduction is named after one of the five categories of rules that Stenros and Montola’s metasynthesis has produced, and that they deem to be the most “analytically fruitful”2 categorizations.

These categories are:

  • Formal rules: the explicit statements that constitute games
  • Internal rules: the often private rules and goals that players set for themselves
  • Social rules: the indeterminate shared social and cultural norms and values that guide gameplay
  • External regulation: the rules and laws enforced by the surrounding society that impact gameplay
  • Material rules: the material embodiments of rules and the ‘brute circumstances’ of play

The many definitions and explanations they give throughout the book are always necessary, timely, and serve to ground the prose in a digestible, conversational fashion. In explaining their approach, the authors presume no prior knowledge of game studies and skillfully communicate their theoretical standpoint. Those both familiar and unfamiliar with Stenros and Montola’s previous work will benefit from their practical examples, which are deployed whenever the authors introduce a new concept.

When they first introduce their five categories of rules, Stenros and Montola use the example case-study of the game pick-up sticks. Using this game, they denote how even a game globally understood to be very simple still engages with each of these five categories of rules—hence making it a game. Before playing pick-up sticks, players would have to agree on formal and material rules such as the point values of the sticks and the conditions for winning and losing. Any uncertainty during play is negotiated by social rules, values that guide social interaction and gameplay. The authors use the example of playing pick-up sticks with young children specifically. This is to illustrate one example of how adopting internal rules works in practice, by deliberately introducing “secret” rules in order to give younger players a chance to win while still keeping the game exciting and challenging for other players.

Stenros and Montola address early in the text that, within the realm of game studies, the “default case” of games is often either a digital game or a board game. They resolve to shift between these two modes of play across each chapter as they focus on different aspects of “gameness” and game rules. They alternate between sports, role-playing games, board games, digital games, virtual worlds, and esports while acknowledging the overlaps that occur between these categories. This range of examples is a huge strength of the book, as it proves that the five rule categories, while of differing importance to each type of game, are necessary across the continuum of “play” to “games.”  Stenros and Montola’s conceptualization of a continuum rather than a binary serves to illustrate their core analysis that that “there is no identifiable and unambiguous formal core [to a game] that we can isolate,”3 and that play is the experience of a player’s interpretation and application of rules in practice. Before diving into formal rules in Chapter 1, the authors give space to explaining playfulness and play. This situates how the aforementioned continuum is marked by an “increase in complexity of social construction and rules.”4 Here, Stenros and Montola draw upon social constructionism to position play as an institution and rules as a mechanism for bringing about institutional facts.

Cover of The Rule Book by Jaakko Stenros and Markus Montola
Cover of The Rule Book by Jaakko Stenros and Markus Montola

In Chapter 1, the longest chapter, Stenros and Montola posit that formal rules must still be interpreted and are liable to misinterpretation, meaning that learning rules can be a “messy process.” I was surprised that they did not mention the semi-recent trend of board game rule pages beginning with a “Don’t read this! Watch this video here which explains the game!” However, there is a certain charm in having the reader make that connection for themself when surrounded by very similar ideas, such as the difference between the rules and the Learn to Play booklet that accompanies many board games. Stenros and Montola also interrogate Salen and Zimmerman’s (2004) six-quality long framework of formal rules here. They assert their position that these qualities (that rules limit player action, are explicit and unambiguous, are shared by all players, are fixed, are binding, and are repeatable across game instances) can be broken in experimental game design. The authors assert that Salen and Zimmerman’s framework only holds within the “ideal situation” of a game, and not in the practice of play. This chapter covers a remarkable amount of conditions and sub-types of formal rules, in order to consistently illustrate the practical application of these categories.

The second chapter focuses considerably more on role-playing games when evaluating internal rules: rules players set for themselves. Stenros and Montola suggest that internal rules are difficult to cite, and even that they cannot be understood in relation to formal rules alone. This chapter is especially innovative insofar as Stenros and Montola’s argument that “the idea of internal rules is tied to a specific conceptualization of “game.”5 The existence of internal rules fundamentally positions games as “negotiated activities” and demonstrates that “[rules] are in the process of becoming[,] through the act of playing.”6 Stenros and Montola argue that internal rules are rules for the reason of being in the process of becoming. I am inclined to agree, since for a condition or constraint to be a rule, it does not have to be in place all the time or in place in every instance of play. Examples of these include restricting the use of save scumming (using multiple save files to reload your progress in a game if you die), or playing Deus Ex as a pacifist throughout a run.

Chapters 3 and 4, on social rules and external regulation, stretch to virtually every corner of play and games. Social rules and external regulation are deeply interlinked, almost to the point where I question whether they are separate. Stenros and Montola define social rules as “a set of cultural codes about the conduct of play,”7 but in essence I believe that they are too interlinked to belong to separate categories, especially since external regulation concerns players’ rights in games, rules invoking the law, and moral judgement.

Chapter 5 perhaps has the most straightforward thesis, as the focus is on the ways in which rules are materially encoded into objects. They first give the example of Pong (1972), wherein the rules of the game are materially encoded into the software and hardware. However, in discussing the Ancient Eygptian game Senet, they assert that contemporary knowledge of the rules of Senet are conjecture based on what is encoded in the material artefacts.

Stenros and Montola also consider physical (un)realities that had never before crossed my mind. They posit that “it is only possible to materially embody rules that are possible to implement with the materials that we [now] possess”8 (emphasis my own). Here, they consider how 16th century Europeans could not yet bounce balls due to not having invented rubber yet, and therefore “[could not] create games that have rules that are materially embodied in a bouncing ball,”9 but that Mesoamerican civilizations had vulcanized rubber thousands of years before, and had played games with a rubber ball since 1400 BCE.

The Rule Book is a deeply ambitious addition to the Playful Thinking series that tackles the heart of games—rules—concisely and masterfully. For its complex subject matter, it is approachable to a very wide range of audiences and will surely be invaluable to scholars and designers alike.

–

Featured image from the cover art of The Rule Book: The Building Blocks of Games (The MIT Press).

–

Beatrix (Bea) Livesey-Stephens (she/her) is an MPhil candidate and researcher at Abertay University, where she studies player calibration in analog intimacy TTRPGs and researches European gaming clusters. Her research interests lie at the intersections of linguistics, sex and relationship education, accessibility, and ethics, in which she attempts to map the limits of transformative play and ludic vulnerability. She is also an Editorial Intern at Analog Game Studies.

 

 

 

Critical Hits!

  • Book Review: Board Games as Media
  • Book Review: Storytelling in the Modern Board Game
  • Book Review: The Role-Playing Society
board gamesboard gamingbook reviewJaakko StenrosMarkus MontolaMIT PressPlayful Thinking seriesrules

Post navigation

Previous PostConstitutive Factors of Mega-Campaigns in TTRPGs: A Systematic Literature ReviewNext PostIt’s All Fun and Games ‘Till Somebody Loses an I: Ethnomethods of Bleed

Volume XII, Issue I

Catalog

  • Volume I, Issue I
  • Volume I, Issue II
  • Vol. I, No. III (October 2014)
  • Volume I, Issue IV
  • Volume I, Issue V
  • Volume II, Issue II
  • Volume II, Issue III
  • Volume II, Issue IV
  • Volume II, Issue V
  • Volume II, Issue VI
  • Volume II, Issue VII
  • Vol. III, No. I (January 2016)
  • Volume III, Issue II
  • Volume III, Issue III
  • Volume III, Issue IV
  • Volume III, Issue V
  • Vol. IV, No. I (January 2017)
  • Volume IV, Issue II
  • Volume IV, Issue III
  • Volume IV, Issue IV
  • Volume IV, Issue V
  • Vol. V, No. I (March 2018)
  • Volume V, Issue II
  • Volume V, Issue III
  • Vol. V, No. IV (December 2018)
  • Volume VI, Issue I
  • Volume VI, Issue II
  • Volume VI, Issue III
  • 2019 Role-Playing Game Summit
  • Special Issue: Analog Games and Translation
  • Volume VII, Issue II
  • Volume VIII, Issue I
  • Volume VIII, Issue II
  • The Fiend Folio
  • Volume IX, Issue I
  • Volume IX, Issue II
  • Volume IX, Issue III
  • Volume IX, Issue IV
  • Volume X, Issue I
  • Volume X, Issue II
  • Volume XI, Issue I
  • Volume XI, Issue II
  • Special Issue: Perspectives on RPG Studies from Latin-American Scholars
  • Volume XI, Issue III
  • Volume XII, Issue I

More posts in…

  • Adrianna Burton
  • Aria Chen
  • Art and Performance Games
  • Axiel Cazeneuve
  • Benjamin James Dyson
  • Board Games
  • Book Review
  • Brian C. Etheridge
  • Brian McKenzie
  • Card Games
  • Chad Wilkinson
  • Cristo Leon
  • Digital Games
  • Edgar Meritano
  • Eduardo Adrian Chavez Lizama
  • Environmental Play
  • et. al.
  • Evan Torner
  • Francisco Fernando Gallego Escobar
  • Interactive Fiction
  • Interview
  • James Lipuma
  • Jason Cox
  • Joseph Dumit
  • Juan David Henao Santa
  • Laura op de Beke
  • Lead Author Shannon McDowell
  • Leo Baik
  • Live Play
  • Live-Action Role-Playing Games
  • Mads Bärenholdt
  • Marco Arnaudo
  • Marcos O. Cabobianco
  • Mauricio Rangel Jimenez
  • Miguel Bastarrachea-Magnani
  • Neal Baker
  • Pawel Bornstedt
  • Peter D. Evan
  • Pilar Girvan
  • Ricardo Morales Carbajal
  • Sabina Belc
  • Scott Nicholson
  • Special to Analog Game Studies
  • Story Games
  • Tabletop Role-Playing Games
  • Theory

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

  1. Stenros, Jaakko, and Markus Montola. 2024. The Rule Book: The Building Blocks of Games. The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/14730.001.0001. p.8.

  2. The Rule Book, p.8.

  3. The Rule Book, p.174.

  4. The Rule Book, p.18.

  5. The Rule Book, p. 57.

  6. The Rule Book, p. 58

  7. The Rule Book, p.85.

  8. The Rule Book p.143.

  9. Ibid.

More posts in…

  • Adrianna Burton
  • Aria Chen
  • Art and Performance Games
  • Axiel Cazeneuve
  • Benjamin James Dyson
  • Board Games
  • Book Review
  • Brian C. Etheridge
  • Brian McKenzie
  • Card Games
  • Chad Wilkinson
  • Cristo Leon
  • Digital Games
  • Edgar Meritano
  • Eduardo Adrian Chavez Lizama
  • Environmental Play
  • et. al.
  • Evan Torner
  • Francisco Fernando Gallego Escobar
  • Interactive Fiction
  • Interview
  • James Lipuma
  • Jason Cox
  • Joseph Dumit
  • Juan David Henao Santa
  • Laura op de Beke
  • Lead Author Shannon McDowell
  • Leo Baik
  • Live Play
  • Live-Action Role-Playing Games
  • Mads Bärenholdt
  • Marco Arnaudo
  • Marcos O. Cabobianco
  • Mauricio Rangel Jimenez
  • Miguel Bastarrachea-Magnani
  • Neal Baker
  • Pawel Bornstedt
  • Peter D. Evan
  • Pilar Girvan
  • Ricardo Morales Carbajal
  • Sabina Belc
  • Scott Nicholson
  • Special to Analog Game Studies
  • Story Games
  • Tabletop Role-Playing Games
  • Theory

Catalog

  • Volume I, Issue I
  • Volume I, Issue II
  • Vol. I, No. III (October 2014)
  • Volume I, Issue IV
  • Volume I, Issue V
  • Analog Players, Analog Space: Video Gaming Beyond the Digital
  • Volume II, Issue II
  • Volume II, Issue III
  • Volume II, Issue IV
  • Volume II, Issue V
  • Volume II, Issue VI
  • Volume II, Issue VII
  • Vol. III, No. I (January 2016)
  • Volume III, Issue II
  • Volume III, Issue III
  • Volume III, Issue IV
  • Volume III, Issue V
  • 2016 Role-Playing Game Summit
  • Vol. IV, No. I (January 2017)
  • Volume IV, Issue II
  • Volume IV, Issue III
  • Volume IV, Issue IV
  • Volume IV, Issue V
  • Vol. V, No. I (March 2018)
  • Volume V, Issue II
  • Volume V, Issue III
  • Vol. V, No. IV (December 2018)
  • Volume VI, Issue I
  • Volume VI, Issue II
  • Volume VI, Issue III
  • 2019 Role-Playing Game Summit
  • Special Issue: Analog Games and Translation
  • Volume VII, Issue II
  • Volume VIII, Issue I
  • Volume VIII, Issue II
  • The Fiend Folio
  • Volume IX, Issue I
  • Volume IX, Issue II
  • Volume IX, Issue III
  • Volume IX, Issue IV
  • Volume X, Issue I
  • Volume X, Issue II
  • Volume XI, Issue I
  • Volume XI, Issue II
  • Special Issue: Perspectives on RPG Studies from Latin-American Scholars
  • Volume XI, Issue III
  • Volume XII, Issue I

Contact

Volume XII, Issue I

Proudly powered by WordPress